Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
SFP or FFP
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Canhunter35" data-source="post: 1329511" data-attributes="member: 101677"><p>From ur pic and what you've said I'm gathering your associated with or own primal rights. You sell tangent theta scopes, they come with illumination, I said get a ffp with illumination so that works out. why else would tangent put it on there if it's not needed?</p><p></p><p>Now onto creds, I hunt coyotes 2x a week through fall, winter, hunt big game every year. When not hunting I practice all the time on my 600 yd range out my door and when I want to stretch it further I set my targets up wherever I want at any distance on my land. I usually shoot through a case of a 1000 primers every 18 months or so. </p><p></p><p>I have a mark 4 sfp(preferred scope). Zeiss conquest, sightron s-tac, and Burris veracity. I can totally understand use of ffp in competition and tactical applications, but found on game if I'm making a quick shot it's relatively close usually because most game isn't too worried if I'm 400+ yds away. So I have time to turn it to full magnification. If it's inside of 400, a 3-9x duplex can get-er done. Since this is a hunting forum, and I hunt all the time, I stated I haven't found any reason to need a ffp for hunting.</p><p> With those scopes I have, I've taken them out on a full moon night to compare and the sfp crosshairs were visible at low magnification, but the ffp was not. When I cranked all of them up, the image darkened way too much to see anything. (Remember this is middle of the night, full moon) of those four, the mark 4 had the best clarity. If anyone cares.</p><p></p><p>Those are my arguments why a ffp isn't necessary for hunting, and according to the polls, I'm not alone</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Canhunter35, post: 1329511, member: 101677"] From ur pic and what you've said I'm gathering your associated with or own primal rights. You sell tangent theta scopes, they come with illumination, I said get a ffp with illumination so that works out. why else would tangent put it on there if it's not needed? Now onto creds, I hunt coyotes 2x a week through fall, winter, hunt big game every year. When not hunting I practice all the time on my 600 yd range out my door and when I want to stretch it further I set my targets up wherever I want at any distance on my land. I usually shoot through a case of a 1000 primers every 18 months or so. I have a mark 4 sfp(preferred scope). Zeiss conquest, sightron s-tac, and Burris veracity. I can totally understand use of ffp in competition and tactical applications, but found on game if I'm making a quick shot it's relatively close usually because most game isn't too worried if I'm 400+ yds away. So I have time to turn it to full magnification. If it's inside of 400, a 3-9x duplex can get-er done. Since this is a hunting forum, and I hunt all the time, I stated I haven't found any reason to need a ffp for hunting. With those scopes I have, I've taken them out on a full moon night to compare and the sfp crosshairs were visible at low magnification, but the ffp was not. When I cranked all of them up, the image darkened way too much to see anything. (Remember this is middle of the night, full moon) of those four, the mark 4 had the best clarity. If anyone cares. Those are my arguments why a ffp isn't necessary for hunting, and according to the polls, I'm not alone [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
SFP or FFP
Top