i would like to hear yalls opinions on whether or not ffp scopes are worth the extra money if theyre going on a hunting rifle. ive read people say that sfp is a waste of time with the reticle for hunting because you have a reticle with graduations, meaning you should get a ffp scope. wouldnt that really depend on the kind of hunting you do? ex: hunting situations in which you have time to power up to full magnification and range the target, then dial in dope/hold over and shoot- here a sfp seems like it would be ok. in hunting situations where you have to more quickly range, dial dope/hold over and make a kill shot- here it seems like a ffp scope would be a much better choice. hunting some animals might present certain situations that other animals might not. NF NXS F1's are just out of my price range. however, im looking at the sfp mil/mil nxs's and they are do-able. i definitely will be hunting with my rig, it will actually be my go to gun for most everything i hunt- whitetail, pigs, varmints etc. i dont plan on ever shooting competitions or matches. im also concerned about the reticle in a ffp scope 1) being too thin for my liking when im hunting in brush and have the scope on low power and 2) being almost invisible in low light situations when the scope is on low power.