Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Wolf Hunting
See a wolf... what would you do?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Topgun 30-06" data-source="post: 611111" data-attributes="member: 28854"><p>I hate to say I told you so, but it didn't take long! Here is the latest release from Ryan Benson/BGF claiming exactly what dogdinger and I stated yesterday and that is that BGF would claim they were instrumental in stopping the wolf introduction into the Baca! If either BGF or SFW are such a force, doesn't it seem odd that Benson had to get this out of a newspaper and wasn't directly contacted by USFWS if they were the ones who got what wasn't even on the table stopped? What a farce!!!</p><p> </p><p>Here it is:</p><p> </p><p>Folks,</p><p>A letter was sent from US Fish and Wildlife Service clearly explaining that NO wolves will be introduced into Colorado's Baca National Wildlife Refuge or other portions of the San Luis Valley. It appears that this letter hit the Colorado press on February 6, 2012.</p><p>It's amazing what can happen when sportsmen get ahead of the curve and take action on important issues affecting wildlife. Supporters of Big Game Forever sent over 15,000 messages to members of Congress and the administration expressing their concern about Option "C" that would include the possibility of using Wolves to manage elk on the refuge. Thank you for taking the time to express your concern regarding the idea of introducing wolves into Southern Colorado. </p><p> </p><p>Here is a copy of the letter from USFWS published by the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel on February 6, 2012:</p><p> </p><p><strong>Wolves will not be reintroduced to San Luis Valley</strong></p><div style="margin-left: 20px">There has been some recent speculation that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service intends to reintroduce wolves in the San Luis Valley to help manage elk and other species. It is important to set the record straight, the service in fact has no plans and no intent to reintroduce wolves in the valley.</div> <div style="margin-left: 20px"></div> <div style="margin-left: 20px">The confusion about the service's intent arose from a draft plan to manage overabundant elk populations affecting vital wildlife habitat on the San Luis Valley's National Wildlife Refuges. The draft plan references a suggestion by some members of the public that the service consider wolves as a potential management tool.</div> <div style="margin-left: 20px"></div> <div style="margin-left: 20px">By law, the service is required to analyze the comments and suggestions we receive. We do not, however, believe that wolf reintroduction is the appropriate management strategy for this area. We have instead put forward three other options including public hunting, which we believe will help ensure that the wildlife refuges in the San Luis Valley continue to provide high quality habitat for elk and other species — as well as recreational and economic benefits for local communities.</div> <div style="margin-left: 20px"></div> <div style="margin-left: 20px">We encourage members of the public and our partners to review and comment on this important draft plan as we work to finalize it over the next two years. We're committed to ensuring that the San Luis Valley's land, water, and wildlife remain the pride of Colorado and the nation for years to come.</div> <div style="margin-left: 20px"></div> <div style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>STEVE GUERTIN</strong></div> <div style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>Regional Director, Mountain-Prairie Region</strong></div> <div style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service</strong></div> <div style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>Denver</strong></div> <div style="margin-left: 20px"></div></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Topgun 30-06, post: 611111, member: 28854"] I hate to say I told you so, but it didn't take long! Here is the latest release from Ryan Benson/BGF claiming exactly what dogdinger and I stated yesterday and that is that BGF would claim they were instrumental in stopping the wolf introduction into the Baca! If either BGF or SFW are such a force, doesn't it seem odd that Benson had to get this out of a newspaper and wasn't directly contacted by USFWS if they were the ones who got what wasn't even on the table stopped? What a farce!!! Here it is: Folks, A letter was sent from US Fish and Wildlife Service clearly explaining that NO wolves will be introduced into Colorado's Baca National Wildlife Refuge or other portions of the San Luis Valley. It appears that this letter hit the Colorado press on February 6, 2012. It's amazing what can happen when sportsmen get ahead of the curve and take action on important issues affecting wildlife. Supporters of Big Game Forever sent over 15,000 messages to members of Congress and the administration expressing their concern about Option "C" that would include the possibility of using Wolves to manage elk on the refuge. Thank you for taking the time to express your concern regarding the idea of introducing wolves into Southern Colorado. Here is a copy of the letter from USFWS published by the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel on February 6, 2012: [B]Wolves will not be reintroduced to San Luis Valley[/B] [INDENT]There has been some recent speculation that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service intends to reintroduce wolves in the San Luis Valley to help manage elk and other species. It is important to set the record straight, the service in fact has no plans and no intent to reintroduce wolves in the valley. The confusion about the service’s intent arose from a draft plan to manage overabundant elk populations affecting vital wildlife habitat on the San Luis Valley’s National Wildlife Refuges. The draft plan references a suggestion by some members of the public that the service consider wolves as a potential management tool. By law, the service is required to analyze the comments and suggestions we receive. We do not, however, believe that wolf reintroduction is the appropriate management strategy for this area. We have instead put forward three other options including public hunting, which we believe will help ensure that the wildlife refuges in the San Luis Valley continue to provide high quality habitat for elk and other species — as well as recreational and economic benefits for local communities. We encourage members of the public and our partners to review and comment on this important draft plan as we work to finalize it over the next two years. We’re committed to ensuring that the San Luis Valley’s land, water, and wildlife remain the pride of Colorado and the nation for years to come. [B]STEVE GUERTIN[/B] [B]Regional Director, Mountain-Prairie Region[/B] [B]U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service[/B] [B]Denver[/B] [/INDENT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Wolf Hunting
See a wolf... what would you do?
Top