Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
scope selection
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grumulkin" data-source="post: 527865" data-attributes="member: 29281"><p>My Nightforce intended for long range shooting has the Mil-Dot reticle but a lot of the other Nightforce reticles look just as good if not better.</p><p></p><p>And for those who want to know why I covered up the holes that give a larger group; I'm a thrifty sort of person. The target had been previously used and patched; the shots pictured were 3 consecutive shots. For what it's worth, I detest the "flyer" excuse invented by gun writers to make a gun they were testing sound better than it really was. I also detest the "if I do my part phrase" which is also frequently used to make a gun sound better than it is. I know that if I do my part, which is usually the case at least off the bench, I'm capable of holding 0.25 MOA or better so if a group is worse than that, it's not me, it's the gun/scope or the load.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grumulkin, post: 527865, member: 29281"] My Nightforce intended for long range shooting has the Mil-Dot reticle but a lot of the other Nightforce reticles look just as good if not better. And for those who want to know why I covered up the holes that give a larger group; I'm a thrifty sort of person. The target had been previously used and patched; the shots pictured were 3 consecutive shots. For what it's worth, I detest the "flyer" excuse invented by gun writers to make a gun they were testing sound better than it really was. I also detest the "if I do my part phrase" which is also frequently used to make a gun sound better than it is. I know that if I do my part, which is usually the case at least off the bench, I'm capable of holding 0.25 MOA or better so if a group is worse than that, it's not me, it's the gun/scope or the load. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
scope selection
Top