Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Ruger M-77 Mark II
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IdahoJoe" data-source="post: 471858" data-attributes="member: 23980"><p>I have 2 Ruger 77 mark II's. The first is a 223. with a timney trigger and a vari-x II 4-12 power scope. It shoots as well as I do (sub MOA). The second is a 338 win mag that has the action bedded and the barrel floated and a timney trigger and a muzzle break. I have a vari-x II 3-9 power scope on it. I won't say it doesn't shoot as good but I certainly don't shoot it as good as I do my 223. I don't know if it is the load, or the scope or the gun or the way I treated the gun when I first got it (It was my fist big game rifle). I suspect it is a combination of the lower magnification and the recoil (me). both these guns were purchased in the late 90's and I feel the trigger work was a necessity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IdahoJoe, post: 471858, member: 23980"] I have 2 Ruger 77 mark II's. The first is a 223. with a timney trigger and a vari-x II 4-12 power scope. It shoots as well as I do (sub MOA). The second is a 338 win mag that has the action bedded and the barrel floated and a timney trigger and a muzzle break. I have a vari-x II 3-9 power scope on it. I won't say it doesn't shoot as good but I certainly don't shoot it as good as I do my 223. I don't know if it is the load, or the scope or the gun or the way I treated the gun when I first got it (It was my fist big game rifle). I suspect it is a combination of the lower magnification and the recoil (me). both these guns were purchased in the late 90's and I feel the trigger work was a necessity. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Ruger M-77 Mark II
Top