Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Reticule vs Reticle IOR scopes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jdawson" data-source="post: 630257" data-attributes="member: 42264"><p>Well, thank you for answering my questions. I personally didn't notice the spelling of "reticule" a few buddies did and they passed on the idea of us all purchasing one. I, however am still interested because i can punch out to a grand and stay on 1 rotation, from what it seems i cant really tell by the pic.... I like the 6-24x35mm ffp mil/mil mp8 dot. Right now I use a mark4 ert. The turrets bother me because after 1200m (12.7 mils, which is over 2 rotations) i seem to get lost on my way back down and at times have to start over from zero. I have used Schmidt and Benders and Primer Rectical optics but dont feel the need to spend 4 grand for a scope. so, i stuck with reputation and popularity in the Mark 4 m5 ert. Some of my buddies went even cheaper and got Vortex pst's ffp and i see no real big difference in glass clarity. infact, i find it easier to use there scope then mine. plus vortex policy is next to no one. if it breaks, send it back, get it fixed, period. So..the two right now I seem to be focused on is the razor HD and the IOR Valdada. they both are close in price, but i like the turrets and mp8 dot on the IOR. </p><p></p><p>Oh, and i plan on taking very long shots, So indeed if the clarity of the Mark 4 is superior as well as tracking and using the retical as a measuring device, over the razor and IOR then ill stick with it, and make due with my discomforts. </p><p></p><p>sorry so long but hope I gave u an idea. You mentioned IOR was on par with Leupold. If so, in fact, to get the feature I want, I would save money going with IOR?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jdawson, post: 630257, member: 42264"] Well, thank you for answering my questions. I personally didn't notice the spelling of "reticule" a few buddies did and they passed on the idea of us all purchasing one. I, however am still interested because i can punch out to a grand and stay on 1 rotation, from what it seems i cant really tell by the pic.... I like the 6-24x35mm ffp mil/mil mp8 dot. Right now I use a mark4 ert. The turrets bother me because after 1200m (12.7 mils, which is over 2 rotations) i seem to get lost on my way back down and at times have to start over from zero. I have used Schmidt and Benders and Primer Rectical optics but dont feel the need to spend 4 grand for a scope. so, i stuck with reputation and popularity in the Mark 4 m5 ert. Some of my buddies went even cheaper and got Vortex pst's ffp and i see no real big difference in glass clarity. infact, i find it easier to use there scope then mine. plus vortex policy is next to no one. if it breaks, send it back, get it fixed, period. So..the two right now I seem to be focused on is the razor HD and the IOR Valdada. they both are close in price, but i like the turrets and mp8 dot on the IOR. Oh, and i plan on taking very long shots, So indeed if the clarity of the Mark 4 is superior as well as tracking and using the retical as a measuring device, over the razor and IOR then ill stick with it, and make due with my discomforts. sorry so long but hope I gave u an idea. You mentioned IOR was on par with Leupold. If so, in fact, to get the feature I want, I would save money going with IOR? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Reticule vs Reticle IOR scopes?
Top