Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Recommend a quality Ti action
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AaronSkipDavidson" data-source="post: 1244770" data-attributes="member: 6373"><p>Overall, without having a product to inspect quality, I would say they are very similar. We chose to duplicate the traditional Rem 700 footprint and Wyatt length magazine. Our extraction is superior to the mini M-16 retrofits in a two lug bolt. Also, it appears Lone Peak uses the traditional Remington style bolt/cocking peice/firing pin. We have developed a twin cam bayonet style system that yields lighter bolt lift with faster lock times. Not huge improvements, but enough to justify the cost differences.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AaronSkipDavidson, post: 1244770, member: 6373"] Overall, without having a product to inspect quality, I would say they are very similar. We chose to duplicate the traditional Rem 700 footprint and Wyatt length magazine. Our extraction is superior to the mini M-16 retrofits in a two lug bolt. Also, it appears Lone Peak uses the traditional Remington style bolt/cocking peice/firing pin. We have developed a twin cam bayonet style system that yields lighter bolt lift with faster lock times. Not huge improvements, but enough to justify the cost differences. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Recommend a quality Ti action
Top