QuickLoad ?????????????

bigbuck

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
1,650
I need someone who has quickload to help me out if you would I'd greatly appreciate it. I have new nosler brass I need info for my remington 300 ultra mag sendero I plan on loading 101.1 grains of us 869 powder with federal 215 match primers OAL will be 3.675 . ,210 grain berger, barrel 1-10 twist 26'' long.

Thanks BIGBUCK:)
 
Last edited:
This output data is only as good as the input data. To give a more accurate results your exact case capacity and chronograph readings from several different loads would be needed, but what you gave should be enough to get you in the ball park. Though this simulation may be very accurate you still need to work up carefully.






Will repost the corrected data!
 
Last edited:
Thank you steve for your help, I have 6 rounds loaded already with 101.1 grains of us 869 I kind of wish that I would of taken a look at these numbers befor I started.

Thanks ,

BIGBUCK
 
This should be a bit more realistic, but like I said before, it is best to work up the load over a chronograph. Special attention should be given to the two variations of powder burn rate. Increasing the burn rate by 10% takes a nominal 54kpsi load to a 65+kpsi without a change it charge weight, so as usual work up the load slowly. By that I mean start low (say 96-97gr), if a chronograph is used, a step of 1gr intervals is not out of the question with a case capacity that of the RUM.


The columns read
1st % of 101.1gr
2nd % of case filled
3rd Actual charge weight in grains
4th Velocity in fps
5th Energy in lb*ft
6th Pressure maximum in psi
7th Muzzel pressure in psi
8th % of propellent burned
9th Propellent burn time in milli seconds

Cartridge : .300 Rem Ultra Mag
Bullet : .308, 210, Berger M T VLD
Useable Case Capaci: 101.203 grain H2O = 6.571 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.675 inch = 93.35 mm
Barrel Length : 26.0 inch = 660.4 mm
Powder : Hodgdon US 869

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-20.0 81 80.88 2256 2372 28270 10451 79.3 1.783
-18.0 83 82.90 2316 2500 30086 10866 80.9 1.741
-16.0 85 84.92 2376 2633 32034 11281 82.4 1.701
-14.0 87 86.95 2438 2772 34134 11693 83.9 1.660
-12.0 90 88.97 2501 2916 36402 12102 85.3 1.621
-10.0 92 90.99 2564 3065 38841 12505 86.8 1.581
-08.0 94 93.01 2628 3221 41472 12900 88.1 1.543
-06.0 96 95.03 2693 3382 44313 13287 89.5 1.504
-04.0 98 97.06 2759 3548 47376 13663 90.7 1.467
-02.0 100 99.08 2825 3721 50653 14026 91.9 1.429
+00.0 102 101.10 2892 3899 54165 14375 93.1 1.393
+02.0 104 103.12 2959 4083 57956 14707 94.2 1.351 ! Near Maximum !
+04.0 106 105.14 3027 4273 62062 15020 95.2 1.308 ! Near Maximum !
+06.0 108 107.17 3096 4469 66514 15312 96.1 1.265 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+08.0 110 109.19 3165 4671 71351 15582 96.9 1.224 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+10.0 112 111.21 3235 4879 76616 15826 97.6 1.184 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge

Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 102 101.10 3074 4406 65680 14787 98.4 1.280 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 102 101.10 2667 3318 43258 13240 83.9 1.505
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 15 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top