Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Question for Kirby
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fiftydriver" data-source="post: 218930" data-attributes="member: 10"><p>In the Sabot testing I have seen, accuracy was not what we would be interested for long range precision shooting. One main problem is that the Sabots drop frictional coefficent and that makes the huge case capacity even less functional to get consistant buring of these huge powder volumes.</p><p> </p><p>A better round would be a 50 spotter necked down to 338 or 375. Heck for that matter, just a 338 AM or 375 AM would match that in performance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fiftydriver, post: 218930, member: 10"] In the Sabot testing I have seen, accuracy was not what we would be interested for long range precision shooting. One main problem is that the Sabots drop frictional coefficent and that makes the huge case capacity even less functional to get consistant buring of these huge powder volumes. A better round would be a 50 spotter necked down to 338 or 375. Heck for that matter, just a 338 AM or 375 AM would match that in performance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Question for Kirby
Top