Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
OCW thoughts....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="new2mud" data-source="post: 1904369" data-attributes="member: 24831"><p>For OCW you also want the horizontal average of the group—so you would wind up with a single point (x,y) for each group. Then we look at minimal shift between consecutive charges —not just vertical. Perhaps mark a red dot for the (x,y) center of each group. </p><p></p><p>I like that you have lots of data on that sheet. If we were to analyze it using the Satterlee method, then you could just focus on 45.8-45.9 due to the minimal velocity gain and then move on to seating depth.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="new2mud, post: 1904369, member: 24831"] For OCW you also want the horizontal average of the group—so you would wind up with a single point (x,y) for each group. Then we look at minimal shift between consecutive charges —not just vertical. Perhaps mark a red dot for the (x,y) center of each group. I like that you have lots of data on that sheet. If we were to analyze it using the Satterlee method, then you could just focus on 45.8-45.9 due to the minimal velocity gain and then move on to seating depth. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
OCW thoughts....
Top