Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
NX8 4-32x50 MOAR owners check In
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Casscade" data-source="post: 3095202" data-attributes="member: 5002"><p>I'll give my 2 cents, I've got a few atacr's and nx8's, overall the nx8 checks so many boxes for me that no other scope does I keep going back to it. The atacr is immediately easier to get behind and has a view that at first glance seems cleaner. The better dof gives the initial illusion it may be a bit better even though it really isn't, it's just easier to get there in the atacr. </p><p></p><p>In the low powers the atacr tends to have less edge distortion and a cleaner image, but after 10x or so the nx8 really shines, the distortion is gone and the image gets better at power imo. </p><p></p><p>If you center up I personally like it better than the atacr's mainly due to the color/contrast, brighter image. Also keep in mind this is comparing a 50 to 56. Every nx8 I've had so far have all been brighter and have better contrast that the atacr's I've owned which all had the same warm flatter view, (for me meaning less bright with less pop).</p><p></p><p>Again, I love both scopes but the nx8 has so much versatility with the extreme power ranges, great glass with great color and contrast, fairly light while being durable and compact, large apparent fov's that doesn't tunnel like the atacr at low power. I mean the 2.5-20 and 4-32 pretty much covers it all imo for the most part. </p><p></p><p>They're not perfect but they're pretty d@mn close short of a bad sample. </p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]567823[/ATTACH]</p><p>l</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Casscade, post: 3095202, member: 5002"] I'll give my 2 cents, I've got a few atacr's and nx8's, overall the nx8 checks so many boxes for me that no other scope does I keep going back to it. The atacr is immediately easier to get behind and has a view that at first glance seems cleaner. The better dof gives the initial illusion it may be a bit better even though it really isn't, it’s just easier to get there in the atacr. In the low powers the atacr tends to have less edge distortion and a cleaner image, but after 10x or so the nx8 really shines, the distortion is gone and the image gets better at power imo. If you center up I personally like it better than the atacr's mainly due to the color/contrast, brighter image. Also keep in mind this is comparing a 50 to 56. Every nx8 I’ve had so far have all been brighter and have better contrast that the atacr’s I've owned which all had the same warm flatter view, (for me meaning less bright with less pop). Again, I love both scopes but the nx8 has so much versatility with the extreme power ranges, great glass with great color and contrast, fairly light while being durable and compact, large apparent fov's that doesn’t tunnel like the atacr at low power. I mean the 2.5-20 and 4-32 pretty much covers it all imo for the most part. They’re not perfect but they’re pretty d@mn close short of a bad sample. [ATTACH type="full" alt="1714410557602.jpeg"]567823[/ATTACH] l [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
NX8 4-32x50 MOAR owners check In
Top