Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Norma 217 & 264 Win Mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jrsolocam" data-source="post: 954723" data-attributes="member: 24511"><p>This is what I do when looking to find a load for either a cartridge or powder that doesn't have published data. Look for ratios, if in other similar cases, powder charges are x% higher than powder b, and I'm looking for powder b, I have a starting point. Essentially it's cross referencing. Then I back it up with QL. </p><p></p><p>I've done this with Dakota cases and Berger bullets, and Norma MRP and common cases. For example, 7828ssc and MRP have very close charge weights. This has worked well for me. Start low and work up, like always.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jrsolocam, post: 954723, member: 24511"] This is what I do when looking to find a load for either a cartridge or powder that doesn't have published data. Look for ratios, if in other similar cases, powder charges are x% higher than powder b, and I'm looking for powder b, I have a starting point. Essentially it's cross referencing. Then I back it up with QL. I've done this with Dakota cases and Berger bullets, and Norma MRP and common cases. For example, 7828ssc and MRP have very close charge weights. This has worked well for me. Start low and work up, like always. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Norma 217 & 264 Win Mag
Top