Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Nightforce vs Leupold
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lamiglas" data-source="post: 1102900" data-attributes="member: 11075"><p>Not interested in debating, just want to throw in my 2 cents. I have owned several mark 4's and have found them to be longrange friendly. For me this means glass is good enough, turrets are solid/positive without slack, good parallax adjustment and above all it has to track perfectly repeatable. The mark 4 does all of this, but not nearly as well as the Nxs. There has been alot of times I really wanted to like the leupold better, or even as well as the NF nxs because it costs less and is lighter. however, after using one side by side I have a hard time believing anyone would think are even in the same league. I do believe they feel that way, and not looking to argue, I just do not see how they could feel that way. The mark 4 does have great glass but I think the edge goes to the nxs. Also, I can fine tune the Parallax better on the nxs. Concerning turret feel, ruggedness, and repeatability the nightforce is in a league of its own. In my opinion. Also, to me, the nxs zero stop is almost worth the price difference by itself. After saying all of that, I cannot afford to put an nxs on all my rifles. I believe I will always have one on my primary longrange rig though, and will keep mark 4's on other rifles i plan to dial with. Lastly, I am not brand specific and I do like the mark 4 better than the NF shv. Mostly concerning turret feel, and because the shv has covered turrets. Other than the weight issue for a dedicated light rifle I have never heard of anyone dissapointed after buying an nxs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lamiglas, post: 1102900, member: 11075"] Not interested in debating, just want to throw in my 2 cents. I have owned several mark 4's and have found them to be longrange friendly. For me this means glass is good enough, turrets are solid/positive without slack, good parallax adjustment and above all it has to track perfectly repeatable. The mark 4 does all of this, but not nearly as well as the Nxs. There has been alot of times I really wanted to like the leupold better, or even as well as the NF nxs because it costs less and is lighter. however, after using one side by side I have a hard time believing anyone would think are even in the same league. I do believe they feel that way, and not looking to argue, I just do not see how they could feel that way. The mark 4 does have great glass but I think the edge goes to the nxs. Also, I can fine tune the Parallax better on the nxs. Concerning turret feel, ruggedness, and repeatability the nightforce is in a league of its own. In my opinion. Also, to me, the nxs zero stop is almost worth the price difference by itself. After saying all of that, I cannot afford to put an nxs on all my rifles. I believe I will always have one on my primary longrange rig though, and will keep mark 4's on other rifles i plan to dial with. Lastly, I am not brand specific and I do like the mark 4 better than the NF shv. Mostly concerning turret feel, and because the shv has covered turrets. Other than the weight issue for a dedicated light rifle I have never heard of anyone dissapointed after buying an nxs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Nightforce vs Leupold
Top