Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Nightforce NX8 4-32 MOA opinions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elk Hunter 338" data-source="post: 1810830" data-attributes="member: 23509"><p>They are fantastic little scopes and nightforce is headed in the right direction..</p><p>32 power is a bit much on this size of optic! that high of mag is useful on a 34 or 35mm main tube and 56 mm obj .. but on the other end the 2.5 is to low for F1.</p><p>on high power the reticle is huge in my mind and they would've been better to do a floating dot like Kahles has.</p><p>i found that i use mine on 4-22'sh power even when shooting for tiny groups 32 washes out alot and like i said before the reticle is huge.</p><p>the glass is good for this size of scope and its on par with nxs for sure. they will never compare to the bigger alpha class scopes because... well they are half the size... so that point to me is mute.</p><p>the eye box is really forgiving for my eye so no complaints there</p><p>i do like the capped turrets and lower profile of them to improve them they should flatten them out and make them a little bigger around (March compacts have the best turret lay out ive seen) i also like the compactness but they really should have gotten away from the MOAR reticle and designed something new, the MOAR is fine but there are so many better reticle out there. what they really need to do is design a scope in the 18-23oz weight, lower pro turrets, 4-24 mag range, new designed less cluttered more basic needs reticle with smaller floating dot or something in F2. Honestly the 2.10x32 is a pretty RADD scope!! they should have built off that design and ran with it !! 2.5-22x44!!!! SFP MOAR T.. take my money now!!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elk Hunter 338, post: 1810830, member: 23509"] They are fantastic little scopes and nightforce is headed in the right direction.. 32 power is a bit much on this size of optic! that high of mag is useful on a 34 or 35mm main tube and 56 mm obj .. but on the other end the 2.5 is to low for F1. on high power the reticle is huge in my mind and they would've been better to do a floating dot like Kahles has. i found that i use mine on 4-22'sh power even when shooting for tiny groups 32 washes out alot and like i said before the reticle is huge. the glass is good for this size of scope and its on par with nxs for sure. they will never compare to the bigger alpha class scopes because... well they are half the size... so that point to me is mute. the eye box is really forgiving for my eye so no complaints there i do like the capped turrets and lower profile of them to improve them they should flatten them out and make them a little bigger around (March compacts have the best turret lay out ive seen) i also like the compactness but they really should have gotten away from the MOAR reticle and designed something new, the MOAR is fine but there are so many better reticle out there. what they really need to do is design a scope in the 18-23oz weight, lower pro turrets, 4-24 mag range, new designed less cluttered more basic needs reticle with smaller floating dot or something in F2. Honestly the 2.10x32 is a pretty RADD scope!! they should have built off that design and ran with it !! 2.5-22x44!!!! SFP MOAR T.. take my money now!!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Nightforce NX8 4-32 MOA opinions
Top