Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
NF ATACR F1 4-16X42
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greyfox" data-source="post: 1447803" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>Good choice! I own the NF F1 ATACR/MiL-R, and the S&B PMII/P4F in the 5x25 versions. IMO, both are in the top tier of this class of scope in terms of optical quality, mechanicals, and reliability. IMO, the ATACR F1 is a noticeable step up in glass, turret design, and parallax/focus control over the standard ATACR, moving it closer to the S&B. Having used a variety of the different reticle styles from simple mildot to the elaborate "Christmas tree" styled reticle designs, for hunting purposes I personally like and prefer the MIL-R and P4F reticles(which are quite similar) over the more cluttered designs. To my eyes, they have the reticle substensions and features well optimized, providing good visibility and usability encountered in hunting conditions, particularly low light and shadowed target areas. Just one mans opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greyfox, post: 1447803, member: 10291"] Good choice! I own the NF F1 ATACR/MiL-R, and the S&B PMII/P4F in the 5x25 versions. IMO, both are in the top tier of this class of scope in terms of optical quality, mechanicals, and reliability. IMO, the ATACR F1 is a noticeable step up in glass, turret design, and parallax/focus control over the standard ATACR, moving it closer to the S&B. Having used a variety of the different reticle styles from simple mildot to the elaborate “Christmas tree” styled reticle designs, for hunting purposes I personally like and prefer the MIL-R and P4F reticles(which are quite similar) over the more cluttered designs. To my eyes, they have the reticle substensions and features well optimized, providing good visibility and usability encountered in hunting conditions, particularly low light and shadowed target areas. Just one mans opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
NF ATACR F1 4-16X42
Top