Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
New Super-High-BC Flat Line Bullets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darkker" data-source="post: 1133499" data-attributes="member: 81406"><p>At no point did I "take shots" at the OP for posting about a product. What I did, was to dispel outlandish marketing claims, that have no scientific basis. I did send a lot more Pressure testing data with notes and a letter(email) to Mr. Warner, as I told him on the phone I would; long before I ever posted them elsewhere. It would appear he chose to ignore the info, which is no skin off my nose.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps you took exception with my wording about the blog? Fine and dandy. I didn't at all get that he was merely repeating info. Comparing long match-type bullets with the inappropriate G1, and a single G1 rating at that?! WEZ analysis based upon that... His opinions and mine are worth exactly what you paid for them, ignore either accordingly.</p><p></p><p>As for your question about testing to distance:</p><p>No, unfortunately I have not; just finally winding down. </p><p>A good friend was badly burned last week, and has altered my free time plans. Going to try and get it done in the next few weeks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darkker, post: 1133499, member: 81406"] At no point did I "take shots" at the OP for posting about a product. What I did, was to dispel outlandish marketing claims, that have no scientific basis. I did send a lot more Pressure testing data with notes and a letter(email) to Mr. Warner, as I told him on the phone I would; long before I ever posted them elsewhere. It would appear he chose to ignore the info, which is no skin off my nose. Perhaps you took exception with my wording about the blog? Fine and dandy. I didn't at all get that he was merely repeating info. Comparing long match-type bullets with the inappropriate G1, and a single G1 rating at that?! WEZ analysis based upon that... His opinions and mine are worth exactly what you paid for them, ignore either accordingly. As for your question about testing to distance: No, unfortunately I have not; just finally winding down. A good friend was badly burned last week, and has altered my free time plans. Going to try and get it done in the next few weeks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
New Super-High-BC Flat Line Bullets
Top