Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
New GSC 338 LRH bullets.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryanLitz" data-source="post: 1046931" data-attributes="member: 7848"><p>Mr. Schultz,</p><p></p><p>I've got no interest in continuing this debate with you. My live fire test results are published, and they indicate typically 20% to 30% lower BC's than you provide. None of your explanations of how or why I'm wrong explain this drastic gap between theory and reality. </p><p></p><p>Arguing one theory vs. another theory is OK. Even arguing which test results are more valid is reasonable. However, you're arguing that your 'theoretical' BC's are more accurate than my 'tested' BC's. This is not a reasonable position which is why I'm not interested in continuing the debate. </p><p></p><p>I'm further inclined against this conversation given your pattern of enticing these kinds of debates in various internet forums. You've been proven wrong many times but continue to persist. My hope is that readers can discern between credible test results and computer predictions. There's enough misinformation on the internet which makes it difficult for new shooters to learn.</p><p></p><p>Mr. Schultz, there are very specific design features which explain why your bullets' actual flight performance falls short of the predicted performance. As chief Ballistician for Berger Bullets, you can understand that I'm not at liberty to advise on competing bullets' design. My point is; there's a good reason why your predicted performance falls short of actual, and it's none of the things you're addressing. In other words, rather than trying to make everyone believe in the inflated estimates, you should address the design issues which are responsible for the estimates being optimistic to begin with.</p><p></p><p>-Bryan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryanLitz, post: 1046931, member: 7848"] Mr. Schultz, I've got no interest in continuing this debate with you. My live fire test results are published, and they indicate typically 20% to 30% lower BC's than you provide. None of your explanations of how or why I'm wrong explain this drastic gap between theory and reality. Arguing one theory vs. another theory is OK. Even arguing which test results are more valid is reasonable. However, you're arguing that your 'theoretical' BC's are more accurate than my 'tested' BC's. This is not a reasonable position which is why I'm not interested in continuing the debate. I'm further inclined against this conversation given your pattern of enticing these kinds of debates in various internet forums. You've been proven wrong many times but continue to persist. My hope is that readers can discern between credible test results and computer predictions. There's enough misinformation on the internet which makes it difficult for new shooters to learn. Mr. Schultz, there are very specific design features which explain why your bullets' actual flight performance falls short of the predicted performance. As chief Ballistician for Berger Bullets, you can understand that I'm not at liberty to advise on competing bullets' design. My point is; there's a good reason why your predicted performance falls short of actual, and it's none of the things you're addressing. In other words, rather than trying to make everyone believe in the inflated estimates, you should address the design issues which are responsible for the estimates being optimistic to begin with. -Bryan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
New GSC 338 LRH bullets.
Top