Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
New Bushnell Elite LRHS2 feild trial review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JAYgs8163" data-source="post: 2400402" data-attributes="member: 37460"><p>3.6-18 with the Tremor Reticle is what I have. Both are excellent eye boxes and I am very meticulous when setting up my optic. I may go through a couple sets of rings before I get it to where I like it. The Mark 5 was actually a little harder for me to set up for cheek weld and eye relief, as the scope is so short. I didn't want to run a rail as to keep weight down so the adjustment on setup was quite a PITA. The amount of room between the turrets and scope bell/eyepiece are very limited, so much I had to ditch a pair of 35mm ARC rings. I eventually got the Mark 5 worked out but it took some time. Anyways, when I grab either rig out of the safe I have no qualms about either. I think I paid $800 ea for the 2 Bushnells I have. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]329482[/ATTACH][ATTACH]329483[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JAYgs8163, post: 2400402, member: 37460"] 3.6-18 with the Tremor Reticle is what I have. Both are excellent eye boxes and I am very meticulous when setting up my optic. I may go through a couple sets of rings before I get it to where I like it. The Mark 5 was actually a little harder for me to set up for cheek weld and eye relief, as the scope is so short. I didn’t want to run a rail as to keep weight down so the adjustment on setup was quite a PITA. The amount of room between the turrets and scope bell/eyepiece are very limited, so much I had to ditch a pair of 35mm ARC rings. I eventually got the Mark 5 worked out but it took some time. Anyways, when I grab either rig out of the safe I have no qualms about either. I think I paid $800 ea for the 2 Bushnells I have. [ATTACH]329482[/ATTACH][ATTACH]329483[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
New Bushnell Elite LRHS2 feild trial review
Top