Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Need help with 308
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greyfox" data-source="post: 623833" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>I don't think I would get too hung up on the long bullet jump yet, particularly after hearing the level of accuracy you're getting with the 175 SMK's. I have a couple of Remington Mil Specs that have very long leads, in excess of .180" and they are .25-.5MOA shooters when loaded to the standard COAL of 2.8". The Palmas are shorter, but I would test them for accuracy in your rifle before making any major changes. My experience is that this bullet design is not as finicky about seating depth as other designs such as the VLD styles. iMHO</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greyfox, post: 623833, member: 10291"] I don't think I would get too hung up on the long bullet jump yet, particularly after hearing the level of accuracy you're getting with the 175 SMK's. I have a couple of Remington Mil Specs that have very long leads, in excess of .180" and they are .25-.5MOA shooters when loaded to the standard COAL of 2.8". The Palmas are shorter, but I would test them for accuracy in your rifle before making any major changes. My experience is that this bullet design is not as finicky about seating depth as other designs such as the VLD styles. iMHO [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Need help with 308
Top