Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
N568 and 7 SAUM..Anyone tried this yet?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rijoh" data-source="post: 2558449" data-attributes="member: 109385"><p>You are right, it isn't very common but it does happen. This gets back to density and energy content plus the burn rate make the equation, not just the burn rate.</p><p></p><p>Here's an example from Hodgdon's reloading tool - Staball has a faster burn rate than 4831.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]373877[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Here's another example from Nosler - Magpro is faster burn rate than RL26</p><p>[ATTACH=full]373878[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rijoh, post: 2558449, member: 109385"] You are right, it isn't very common but it does happen. This gets back to density and energy content plus the burn rate make the equation, not just the burn rate. Here's an example from Hodgdon's reloading tool - Staball has a faster burn rate than 4831. [ATTACH type="full" alt="1656019497139.png"]373877[/ATTACH] Here's another example from Nosler - Magpro is faster burn rate than RL26 [ATTACH type="full" alt="1656019569581.png"]373878[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
N568 and 7 SAUM..Anyone tried this yet?
Top