Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
My new video on how to bed the Remington 700
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rscott5028" data-source="post: 578160" data-attributes="member: 24624"><p>My speakers are broken. So, I didn't get to enjoy the drill press. But, I did appreciate the captions including the humor. I'm also with Len regarding the contrast. </p><p> </p><p>I apologize if you covered this, but my understanding is that metallic pillars are there to prevent compression of the stock between the floorplate and reciever over time which might otherwise affect harmonics/accuracy. </p><p> </p><p>The first concept I struggle with is that different materials expand/contract at different rates (aluminum, steel, brass, fiberglass, JB, Devcon...). Is it insignificant here? Or, does anyone consider this a problem? </p><p> </p><p>I suppose that's a minimal issue as this is a common method. </p><p> </p><p>However, with the reciever and barrel indexing off of the rear tang and barrel tape, it doesn't seem that you are assured of full contact between your bottom metal and pillars. Is this intentional/desireable? Or, am I just knit picking? </p><p> </p><p>thanks,</p><p>Richard</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rscott5028, post: 578160, member: 24624"] My speakers are broken. So, I didn't get to enjoy the drill press. But, I did appreciate the captions including the humor. I'm also with Len regarding the contrast. I apologize if you covered this, but my understanding is that metallic pillars are there to prevent compression of the stock between the floorplate and reciever over time which might otherwise affect harmonics/accuracy. The first concept I struggle with is that different materials expand/contract at different rates (aluminum, steel, brass, fiberglass, JB, Devcon...). Is it insignificant here? Or, does anyone consider this a problem? I suppose that's a minimal issue as this is a common method. However, with the reciever and barrel indexing off of the rear tang and barrel tape, it doesn't seem that you are assured of full contact between your bottom metal and pillars. Is this intentional/desireable? Or, am I just knit picking? thanks, Richard [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
My new video on how to bed the Remington 700
Top