Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Regional Forums
West
MT going to cut loose on wolves!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gone Ballistic" data-source="post: 489220" data-attributes="member: 26477"><p>Mustang58,</p><p>I'm at a real loss on how you can make a comment like that. In Nunavut, which is 1250 miles above the Ontario/U.S. border, which is as large as Western Europe, there are over 10,000 Wolves and 60% of the worlds 25,000 Polar Bears, feeding on over one million caribou. There is only one human inhabitant per 25 square miles for a total of 30,000. Over half of the wolves that have been tracked in the northernmost reaches have traveled from the lower Ontario area in the past ten years. They have cut the caribou herds almost in half from their ten year prior count. Wolves from the Sawtooth Pack have now shown up in Utah, Nevada and Oregon. They had to cross severe water hazards of several major river systems to get to Oregon. Wolves from the Lolo Pack have now been found in Washington. These wolves have traveled distances of up to 900 miles. There have been wolves from the Yellowstone Eco area that have made it to Colorado. These **** things are going to keep moving to establish new packs as they get ran out of older, established ones. They will continue to migrate out as long as they aren't kept in check at a rapid pace. It has been proven scientifically. The biologists working on getting them delisted several years ago were doing hair catches and testing the DNA to see how far certain genetically linked wolves had spread out. One of the first major issues the Anti's made was that the genetics weren't diversified enough for delisting. When it was proven that they were, we hunted wolves that next year. I'm really surprised you would make a statement like you did without doing a little more research. When the real truth gets out about how much total devastation the wolves have really done, I think people will see things a whole lot different than they do today. All of the wolf and elk counts have been done with flawed computer modules they have now discovered. The carnage is far greater than the game departments were reporting. The wolf count is now believed to be almost double what they have reported, as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gone Ballistic, post: 489220, member: 26477"] Mustang58, I'm at a real loss on how you can make a comment like that. In Nunavut, which is 1250 miles above the Ontario/U.S. border, which is as large as Western Europe, there are over 10,000 Wolves and 60% of the worlds 25,000 Polar Bears, feeding on over one million caribou. There is only one human inhabitant per 25 square miles for a total of 30,000. Over half of the wolves that have been tracked in the northernmost reaches have traveled from the lower Ontario area in the past ten years. They have cut the caribou herds almost in half from their ten year prior count. Wolves from the Sawtooth Pack have now shown up in Utah, Nevada and Oregon. They had to cross severe water hazards of several major river systems to get to Oregon. Wolves from the Lolo Pack have now been found in Washington. These wolves have traveled distances of up to 900 miles. There have been wolves from the Yellowstone Eco area that have made it to Colorado. These **** things are going to keep moving to establish new packs as they get ran out of older, established ones. They will continue to migrate out as long as they aren't kept in check at a rapid pace. It has been proven scientifically. The biologists working on getting them delisted several years ago were doing hair catches and testing the DNA to see how far certain genetically linked wolves had spread out. One of the first major issues the Anti's made was that the genetics weren't diversified enough for delisting. When it was proven that they were, we hunted wolves that next year. I'm really surprised you would make a statement like you did without doing a little more research. When the real truth gets out about how much total devastation the wolves have really done, I think people will see things a whole lot different than they do today. All of the wolf and elk counts have been done with flawed computer modules they have now discovered. The carnage is far greater than the game departments were reporting. The wolf count is now believed to be almost double what they have reported, as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Regional Forums
West
MT going to cut loose on wolves!!!
Top