Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Regional Forums
West
Montana corner crossing law hb235
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MontanaRifleman" data-source="post: 770068" data-attributes="member: 11717"><p>Jeff, maybe I'm missing something but if there were land swaps and sales and purchases, it should all work out fairly even $$$ wise, shouldn't it?</p><p></p><p>And I agree that 25% for 2 years shouldn't be that big of deal. That said, I think access via BM land is the least desirable solution because cooperation is voluntary on the part of the land owner who could decide not to participate and we are back to square one.</p><p></p><p>I think the best solutions are sales and purchase exchanges, swaps, and permanent easement purchases.</p><p></p><p>Also, I know a few sections of state land that are not good for hunting because they are grain fields, etc., and hold no meaningful game. IMO, the landowner/lessee should be required to purchase those sections as he is the only one who uses and benefits from them. The money from these sales could be used to purchase other lands that offer quality hunting and game habitat.</p><p></p><p>Just some thoughts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MontanaRifleman, post: 770068, member: 11717"] Jeff, maybe I'm missing something but if there were land swaps and sales and purchases, it should all work out fairly even $$$ wise, shouldn't it? And I agree that 25% for 2 years shouldn't be that big of deal. That said, I think access via BM land is the least desirable solution because cooperation is voluntary on the part of the land owner who could decide not to participate and we are back to square one. I think the best solutions are sales and purchase exchanges, swaps, and permanent easement purchases. Also, I know a few sections of state land that are not good for hunting because they are grain fields, etc., and hold no meaningful game. IMO, the landowner/lessee should be required to purchase those sections as he is the only one who uses and benefits from them. The money from these sales could be used to purchase other lands that offer quality hunting and game habitat. Just some thoughts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Regional Forums
West
Montana corner crossing law hb235
Top