Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Moa Reticles
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="flims" data-source="post: 161050" data-attributes="member: 6595"><p>if night force says that you should divide by the amount of minutes then they must have made sure that the 1.047 value has been considered in the equation. can you test that it does not take into consideration that 1.047?</p><p>another point, i have been thought that range finding using reticles is usally accurate to about 5% by trained people. at 700 thats +/- 35yards. some cartidges might not be effected by this error. some might.</p><p>is the reticle in the 1st focal plain? im asking this because if it is not then the extra mag wont proof so beneficial.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="flims, post: 161050, member: 6595"] if night force says that you should divide by the amount of minutes then they must have made sure that the 1.047 value has been considered in the equation. can you test that it does not take into consideration that 1.047? another point, i have been thought that range finding using reticles is usally accurate to about 5% by trained people. at 700 thats +/- 35yards. some cartidges might not be effected by this error. some might. is the reticle in the 1st focal plain? im asking this because if it is not then the extra mag wont proof so beneficial. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Moa Reticles
Top