Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
mil/mil scope?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 328142" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>For one, MILs are for ranging, and by far least desired for adjustment(hold off or dialing). MOAs are for adjustment with higher resolution, and IPHY is a tiny bit more defined still.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's true that reticle bracketing with assumed target size provides nowhere near the accuracy of laser rangefinding.</p><p>And holding over instead of dialing just adds more error to it.</p><p></p><p>I really wish everyone would stop whinning to scope makers, before they get what they ask for,, -screwing the rest of us.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 328142, member: 1521"] For one, MILs are for ranging, and by far least desired for adjustment(hold off or dialing). MOAs are for adjustment with higher resolution, and IPHY is a tiny bit more defined still. It's true that reticle bracketing with assumed target size provides nowhere near the accuracy of laser rangefinding. And holding over instead of dialing just adds more error to it. I really wish everyone would stop whinning to scope makers, before they get what they ask for,, -screwing the rest of us. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
mil/mil scope?
Top