Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Mil-dot vs. BDC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sp6x6" data-source="post: 457402" data-attributes="member: 21869"><p>Loner, Here is some foood for thought, How is it more usefully if your hold over is 100 or 50 yrd increments, I t is not ,the game is not always standing at a said '' ROUND" yardage. You just have to know your holds. A majority of the world uses metric, I use a mill based reticle, for ranging,hold overs, and I dial. I find mils very easy to use,and use for ranging as you said, when a lazer doesnt work. All of the balistic reticles out are a compromise to the true balistic of particular rifle, but are very easy to use when verified</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sp6x6, post: 457402, member: 21869"] Loner, Here is some foood for thought, How is it more usefully if your hold over is 100 or 50 yrd increments, I t is not ,the game is not always standing at a said '' ROUND" yardage. You just have to know your holds. A majority of the world uses metric, I use a mill based reticle, for ranging,hold overs, and I dial. I find mils very easy to use,and use for ranging as you said, when a lazer doesnt work. All of the balistic reticles out are a compromise to the true balistic of particular rifle, but are very easy to use when verified [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Mil-dot vs. BDC
Top