Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
March 2.5-25 scope reviews please
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nwmnbowhunter" data-source="post: 2964069" data-attributes="member: 103431"><p>I have 3 of the 2.5-25x52 with mtr-4 reticle. </p><p></p><p>They've been perfect. </p><p></p><p>I rarely use higher than 17 or so power as it starts getting less clear and eyebox gets tight. </p><p></p><p>Parallax is touchy but it in the field i set it at around 200 yards and i didn't touch it for ten days and 14 animals in Africa from 15 to 450 yards. </p><p></p><p>Eyebox is tight if you don't have good ergonomics with your rifle. I was able to get low hawkins rings to fit and it really lined it up much better and i get a clear picture as soon as i shoulder it. </p><p></p><p>I had an nx8 and the eyebox on that was worse i felt. </p><p></p><p>So overall only complaint is i don't use it over 17x power very often. But if i just accept it is a 2.5-17 power scope i have zero issues with it. </p><p></p><p>52mm is way way way better than the 42. I will not use the 42mm version</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nwmnbowhunter, post: 2964069, member: 103431"] I have 3 of the 2.5-25x52 with mtr-4 reticle. They've been perfect. I rarely use higher than 17 or so power as it starts getting less clear and eyebox gets tight. Parallax is touchy but it in the field i set it at around 200 yards and i didn't touch it for ten days and 14 animals in Africa from 15 to 450 yards. Eyebox is tight if you don't have good ergonomics with your rifle. I was able to get low hawkins rings to fit and it really lined it up much better and i get a clear picture as soon as i shoulder it. I had an nx8 and the eyebox on that was worse i felt. So overall only complaint is i don't use it over 17x power very often. But if i just accept it is a 2.5-17 power scope i have zero issues with it. 52mm is way way way better than the 42. I will not use the 42mm version [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
March 2.5-25 scope reviews please
Top