Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Long Range Hunting Gun Weight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bullet bumper" data-source="post: 890358" data-attributes="member: 17844"><p>So far this gun has been interesting as it can be converted from bi-pod to BR front rest quickly and from monopod to BR rear bag .</p><p>I have discovered that from the BR bench the verticle is better with the bipod than the BR front rest and the horizontal is better in the BR front rest . Which led me to start looking at why . It's been my experience so far with this gun that the bi-pod skates about from side to side more so that it jumps up and down under recoil . Hence good verticle but wider horizontal and it all reverses around when I change to BR front rest . </p><p>I'm still in the research and trial and error phase on this problem. Like it's not a big problem as the total groups size is still good but I would like to eliminate more horizontal using the bi-po and get the group more round . Have not been able to do any prone on the ground at targets yet so that may change things also. </p><p>Could be me also . Something I am doing that don't suit this rig when using the bi-pod. Every group so far is sub 1.25 MOA and most sub .75 MOA but when you pur 4 in .2 and then one drops out to the left 1 inch perfectly inline with the center of the group it's annoying . Which makes me suspicious it could be me . However I can't loose sight of the fact that the action has limitations and it's not a match barrel and chamber either. However I still think the bi-pod and attachment is partly to blame as there is that difference of grouping when changing rest systems . One of the drawbacks to multiple platforms is it can get confusing as to where the issue is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bullet bumper, post: 890358, member: 17844"] So far this gun has been interesting as it can be converted from bi-pod to BR front rest quickly and from monopod to BR rear bag . I have discovered that from the BR bench the verticle is better with the bipod than the BR front rest and the horizontal is better in the BR front rest . Which led me to start looking at why . It's been my experience so far with this gun that the bi-pod skates about from side to side more so that it jumps up and down under recoil . Hence good verticle but wider horizontal and it all reverses around when I change to BR front rest . I'm still in the research and trial and error phase on this problem. Like it's not a big problem as the total groups size is still good but I would like to eliminate more horizontal using the bi-po and get the group more round . Have not been able to do any prone on the ground at targets yet so that may change things also. Could be me also . Something I am doing that don't suit this rig when using the bi-pod. Every group so far is sub 1.25 MOA and most sub .75 MOA but when you pur 4 in .2 and then one drops out to the left 1 inch perfectly inline with the center of the group it's annoying . Which makes me suspicious it could be me . However I can't loose sight of the fact that the action has limitations and it's not a match barrel and chamber either. However I still think the bi-pod and attachment is partly to blame as there is that difference of grouping when changing rest systems . One of the drawbacks to multiple platforms is it can get confusing as to where the issue is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Long Range Hunting Gun Weight
Top