Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Long Range .30s
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RockyMtnMT" data-source="post: 336557" data-attributes="member: 7999"><p>I second both of these guys. I believe that the 30-378 more or less made the 30-416 Rigby obsolete. </p><p> </p><p>I would change your list to:</p><p> </p><p>300 RUM</p><p> </p><p>30-378 Weatherby</p><p> </p><p>30-338 Lapua Imp</p><p> </p><p>To me it comes down to the RUM and the Lapua chamberings. The weatherby chambering brass is too expensive and too soft. JMHO. The 300RUM is the easiest and least expensive to run. The 30-338 Lapua Imp gives you the better brass and a little edge in performance.</p><p> </p><p>Good luck, and enjoy which ever rifle you build.</p><p> </p><p>Steve</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RockyMtnMT, post: 336557, member: 7999"] I second both of these guys. I believe that the 30-378 more or less made the 30-416 Rigby obsolete. I would change your list to: 300 RUM 30-378 Weatherby 30-338 Lapua Imp To me it comes down to the RUM and the Lapua chamberings. The weatherby chambering brass is too expensive and too soft. JMHO. The 300RUM is the easiest and least expensive to run. The 30-338 Lapua Imp gives you the better brass and a little edge in performance. Good luck, and enjoy which ever rifle you build. Steve [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Long Range .30s
Top