Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Load Development Interpretation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jstanton" data-source="post: 2526014" data-attributes="member: 102980"><p>That all makes sense, thank you! Your right I had it in my mind that my ES and SD should always be similar every time all things being equal. If my SD is in the single digits and ES in the mid to low teens, then I want it to be close to that every time but I understand what your saying and just need to have a better understanding of what an acceptable spread is for ES and SD on the same load.</p><p></p><p>Looking back over the results again I cannot get away from that 41.2 and 41.3 group. It just seems a lot worse than the 40.7-41.1 groups. I also can't explain the higher velocity of the 41.2. It makes me want to just through them out of the equation and focus on the 40.7-41.1. The outlier is that 41.5 group that looks good too. What do you think?</p><p></p><p>Would you say just pick 40.9 and start adjusting seating depth for accuracy?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jstanton, post: 2526014, member: 102980"] That all makes sense, thank you! Your right I had it in my mind that my ES and SD should always be similar every time all things being equal. If my SD is in the single digits and ES in the mid to low teens, then I want it to be close to that every time but I understand what your saying and just need to have a better understanding of what an acceptable spread is for ES and SD on the same load. Looking back over the results again I cannot get away from that 41.2 and 41.3 group. It just seems a lot worse than the 40.7-41.1 groups. I also can't explain the higher velocity of the 41.2. It makes me want to just through them out of the equation and focus on the 40.7-41.1. The outlier is that 41.5 group that looks good too. What do you think? Would you say just pick 40.9 and start adjusting seating depth for accuracy? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Load Development Interpretation
Top