Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Load Data for 28 Nosler
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Roughwater" data-source="post: 1569132" data-attributes="member: 33915"><p>I have also loaded up for 28 Nosler. Retumbo works well. I am presently using IMR 8133. It is slightly slower burning. However I am using hammer 143 gn bullets. I was going to use 175 gn ELD-X bullet as well and had even purchased a box (still unopened). But I found I could obtain much higher velocity with the 143's (which actually weigh 145 gn+). But I think the 175 eld would be a great bullet to use as well.</p><p>I've found Nosler's data might be on the Hot side for some rifles. Hodgdon also openly provides data for their products for the 28N which seems more spot on, for some rifles anyway. It seems spot on for more traditional bullets but the hammer hunter bullets obtain higher velicities than traditional bullets with the same powder load. Some use RL-33 but some also have gone to other powders over concerns that RL powders may be Temp sensitive?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Roughwater, post: 1569132, member: 33915"] I have also loaded up for 28 Nosler. Retumbo works well. I am presently using IMR 8133. It is slightly slower burning. However I am using hammer 143 gn bullets. I was going to use 175 gn ELD-X bullet as well and had even purchased a box (still unopened). But I found I could obtain much higher velocity with the 143's (which actually weigh 145 gn+). But I think the 175 eld would be a great bullet to use as well. I've found Nosler's data might be on the Hot side for some rifles. Hodgdon also openly provides data for their products for the 28N which seems more spot on, for some rifles anyway. It seems spot on for more traditional bullets but the hammer hunter bullets obtain higher velicities than traditional bullets with the same powder load. Some use RL-33 but some also have gone to other powders over concerns that RL powders may be Temp sensitive? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Load Data for 28 Nosler
Top