Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Leupy vs. NightForce
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="goodgrouper" data-source="post: 87874" data-attributes="member: 2852"><p>Yes I agree with most of what you said.</p><p></p><p>However, in todays tough competitive sporting/hunting market, if you don't produce a scope in the $200 range and some in the $300 dollar range, you won't be in business long. I can tell you from making a living in this business that hunting scopes outsell target/bench scopes 10 to 1. THe scopes that most of us like here on LRH for our super long range endeavors are made for a minority. </p><p></p><p>A company fixing to make a profit in optics must make some scopes that will alure the average big game hunter. That is why Burris has their Signature series, Bushnell has their 3200's and Trophy's, Nikon has their Buckmaster's and Prostaffs', and Leupold has their VXI and VXII's.</p><p></p><p>If one desires to make a fair comparison, they need to compare scopes of similiar price range. No one would dare argue that it isn't fair to compare a PRostaff and a NXS. So why must we compare VXII's to S&amp;B's? THis was all I was trying to point out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="goodgrouper, post: 87874, member: 2852"] Yes I agree with most of what you said. However, in todays tough competitive sporting/hunting market, if you don't produce a scope in the $200 range and some in the $300 dollar range, you won't be in business long. I can tell you from making a living in this business that hunting scopes outsell target/bench scopes 10 to 1. THe scopes that most of us like here on LRH for our super long range endeavors are made for a minority. A company fixing to make a profit in optics must make some scopes that will alure the average big game hunter. That is why Burris has their Signature series, Bushnell has their 3200's and Trophy's, Nikon has their Buckmaster's and Prostaffs', and Leupold has their VXI and VXII's. If one desires to make a fair comparison, they need to compare scopes of similiar price range. No one would dare argue that it isn't fair to compare a PRostaff and a NXS. So why must we compare VXII's to S&B's? THis was all I was trying to point out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Leupy vs. NightForce
Top