Leupold VX-3 vs. Zeiss Conquest.

[matt_3479]

I am debating between a Zeiss Conquest 3.5-10x44 with mil dot or z-plex, 4.5-14x 44 AO with mil dot or z-plex OR Leupold VX-3 3.5-10x 40 with CDS or the Leupold 4.5-14X40 with CDS for my 300. wsm Browning A-Bolt used on caribou, moose, elk and black bear from 50 to 500 yards. Which i sbetter

Zeiss or Leupold?

 

[woods]

Zeiss

Try the 4.5x14x44 RapidZ 800

 

[opticspecialist]

what the guy above me said. the zeiss rapid z system is better if for any reason you find yourself using a different ammo than you have for your CDS turret. i don't think leupold is the same company they used to be

 

[Autorotate19]

I have both zeiss and leupold and both are great scopes. I think the zeiss may have the edge on glass quality. The other day I was shooting my .204 at 100yards and I could see my bullet holes on 14X.

 

[highridge1]

I'd go Zeiss with no mil dots,#20 reticle with target turrets

 

[fireroad]

I have both and the Zeiss has the edge on the glass, enough so that I will be replacing my Leupolds as funding allows. The 4.5-14x 44 AO (with either mil dot or rapid Z 800) is an awesome scope.

 

[M_freeman]

at the range I can see my 7mm bullet holes at 100 yards at 9x with my 3x9 conquest.

 

[CLICKBANGBANG]

I just bought a Leupold VX-III 3.5-10x40 CDS. It's going on a 7mm RM hunting gun I'm rebuilding. But my wife won't let me have it till after Christmas. I'm stoked to get it, but the 25th could not come any slower.