Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Leupold Mark 6 3-18 vs Vortex Razor Gen 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="5RWill" data-source="post: 1404434" data-attributes="member: 98561"><p>There is no comparison in glass quality IMHO. The Gen II razor is leaps and bounds above the mark 6. I've owned both and hated the MK6. Was the most infuriating scope i've ever owned. Glass was subpar for the price, clicks were mushy as hell (M5B2 knobs), tracking was 2/10ths off at 10 mil, and the eyebox was to date the most sensitive i've ever been behind. Supposedly they've fixed a lot of these issues with the Mark 5 which i'm eagerly awaiting reviews for.</p><p></p><p>The only real downside to the Gen II is the weight. It's glass is far superior in terms of resolution, CA control, and low light to the Mark 6. They're just a total pig of an optic. If you're looking at retail i'd just jump to the AMG or wait and see how the Mark 5s pan out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="5RWill, post: 1404434, member: 98561"] There is no comparison in glass quality IMHO. The Gen II razor is leaps and bounds above the mark 6. I've owned both and hated the MK6. Was the most infuriating scope i've ever owned. Glass was subpar for the price, clicks were mushy as hell (M5B2 knobs), tracking was 2/10ths off at 10 mil, and the eyebox was to date the most sensitive i've ever been behind. Supposedly they've fixed a lot of these issues with the Mark 5 which i'm eagerly awaiting reviews for. The only real downside to the Gen II is the weight. It's glass is far superior in terms of resolution, CA control, and low light to the Mark 6. They're just a total pig of an optic. If you're looking at retail i'd just jump to the AMG or wait and see how the Mark 5s pan out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Leupold Mark 6 3-18 vs Vortex Razor Gen 2
Top