Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Lead Poisoning
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rich Coyle" data-source="post: 2820066" data-attributes="member: 70559"><p>You are BADLY mistaken in your assumption. I was responding to you bringing up a study. I didn't read your posted study, rather mentioned a study I read where the .257" bullets seemed to be more effective than the other bullet diameters. Hammer Bullets didn't influence my reply at all. That study was done years before Hammer Bullets were in business. </p><p></p><p>In my previous post I mentioned three deer. Like I have been doing all my life I made a mistake. It was two bucks and a sheep. The guide though I was missing, or at least gut shooting the sheep until he skinned it. All three hyper velocity 85 grain bullets went right through the lungs. The first two through the sides and hit both lungs and the third when it finally laid down facing us. It was no more than fifty yards away at that time. The guide asked, "Can you thread one through those obstructions and hit the chest?" "No sweat." BANG<strong><span style="font-size: 18px">!</span> </strong>With that the sheep dropped without even a quiver.</p><p></p><p>I have no idea why you chose to carry on this conversation, but if you keep on I will try to accommodate you with a responce.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rich Coyle, post: 2820066, member: 70559"] You are BADLY mistaken in your assumption. I was responding to you bringing up a study. I didn't read your posted study, rather mentioned a study I read where the .257" bullets seemed to be more effective than the other bullet diameters. Hammer Bullets didn't influence my reply at all. That study was done years before Hammer Bullets were in business. In my previous post I mentioned three deer. Like I have been doing all my life I made a mistake. It was two bucks and a sheep. The guide though I was missing, or at least gut shooting the sheep until he skinned it. All three hyper velocity 85 grain bullets went right through the lungs. The first two through the sides and hit both lungs and the third when it finally laid down facing us. It was no more than fifty yards away at that time. The guide asked, "Can you thread one through those obstructions and hit the chest?" "No sweat." BANG[B][SIZE=5]![/SIZE] [/B]With that the sheep dropped without even a quiver. I have no idea why you chose to carry on this conversation, but if you keep on I will try to accommodate you with a responce. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Lead Poisoning
Top