Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
LabRadar Chronograph Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trickymissfit" data-source="post: 1154123" data-attributes="member: 25383"><p>yes I well remember the tests that you did several years back. Your results were pretty close to what I found. Still in the back of my head I get this nagging complaint about it. Was the Ohler (s) reading correct? Hell I don't know, but think they were pretty close. Good enough for 99% of us. The Pact ran parallel with the Ohler if memory is right, but was five to eight feet per second different. No complaint with any of the readings here.</p><p></p><p>I must applaud your work, as most of us would just whine and cry. I think I told you about building a new mount for the Ohler, and the operating window seriously tightened up (say +/- 8fps to about three or four fps). Definitely made the Ohler better! This is the one thing for sure that I like about the LabRadar. An excellent mount. The only thing close to these that I've seen is the Kurzzel (spelled something like that anyway) at about $800.</p><p></p><p> Now to figure out a constant to measure accuracy from, plus still being fast enough to get a reading. 200 fps is about as low of a reading as I've ever seen, but will it go lower? </p><p>gary</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trickymissfit, post: 1154123, member: 25383"] yes I well remember the tests that you did several years back. Your results were pretty close to what I found. Still in the back of my head I get this nagging complaint about it. Was the Ohler (s) reading correct? Hell I don't know, but think they were pretty close. Good enough for 99% of us. The Pact ran parallel with the Ohler if memory is right, but was five to eight feet per second different. No complaint with any of the readings here. I must applaud your work, as most of us would just whine and cry. I think I told you about building a new mount for the Ohler, and the operating window seriously tightened up (say +/- 8fps to about three or four fps). Definitely made the Ohler better! This is the one thing for sure that I like about the LabRadar. An excellent mount. The only thing close to these that I've seen is the Kurzzel (spelled something like that anyway) at about $800. Now to figure out a constant to measure accuracy from, plus still being fast enough to get a reading. 200 fps is about as low of a reading as I've ever seen, but will it go lower? gary [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
LabRadar Chronograph Review
Top