Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Kimber 8400 in WSM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dimecovers3" data-source="post: 60814" data-attributes="member: 3216"><p>Interesting about the 3" box. Does this negate the problem the 7mm had of being short so numbskulls would not try to load it in a .270WSM? I take it that would allow you to seat the bullet out further and regain lost powder capacity and acheive full potential velocity. The 7mm or 270 appeal for 99percent of what I would actually do with it, but that .30 means would be the ultimate one gun , gun. What do you think the recoil would be like with 165 grs ? Harsh? or just not something you would notice shooting at game. I would never want to get myself into a flinching problem and I hate brakes. It is hard to compare recoil between rifles and shotguns, but a strong duck load does not bother me hunting, but I hate to pattern them. Turkey loads give me a migraine by the forth shot sighting in. I would hope the 30 would get your attention on a bench, but never noticed when a deer was the target. That synthetic stock 30 WSM with a nice Zeiss or Swaro would be a real nice rig. Would you go 150 or 165 for deer and varmints?</p><p>Steve</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dimecovers3, post: 60814, member: 3216"] Interesting about the 3" box. Does this negate the problem the 7mm had of being short so numbskulls would not try to load it in a .270WSM? I take it that would allow you to seat the bullet out further and regain lost powder capacity and acheive full potential velocity. The 7mm or 270 appeal for 99percent of what I would actually do with it, but that .30 means would be the ultimate one gun , gun. What do you think the recoil would be like with 165 grs ? Harsh? or just not something you would notice shooting at game. I would never want to get myself into a flinching problem and I hate brakes. It is hard to compare recoil between rifles and shotguns, but a strong duck load does not bother me hunting, but I hate to pattern them. Turkey loads give me a migraine by the forth shot sighting in. I would hope the 30 would get your attention on a bench, but never noticed when a deer was the target. That synthetic stock 30 WSM with a nice Zeiss or Swaro would be a real nice rig. Would you go 150 or 165 for deer and varmints? Steve [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Kimber 8400 in WSM
Top