Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
I've been given the ultimatum...Barnes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SBruce" data-source="post: 571313" data-attributes="member: 21068"><p>I've been shooting the Barnes TSX bullet in 25 caliber for more than a few years now. I don't feel they will expand and transfer as much energy as most normal bullets, <u>given the same impact velocity</u>, but they <u>do</u> penetrate. IMO, we've gotta keep the impact velocity over 1900'/sec for them to open and act like they are designed to act. This is based on antelope lung shots at long distance.</p><p> </p><p>To compensate for lack of expansion and energy transfer on lung shots I used a lighter weight and pushed it faster. That did the trick until the range got over 500/600 yds, then the lower BC started affecting the impact speed.Now there's the Tipped TSX which should perform slightly better than the old TSX when it comes to expansion, but I haven't tried them yet.........key word yet.</p><p> </p><p>The Barnes TSX have shot good in my 25-06, but not everyone has had the same results. At least there are other options if they don't shoot well in your gun. There's a few different "non lead" bullets out there on the market now.</p><p> </p><p>Just let her know the bullets will be more expensive and you'll maybe have to shoot quite a few of them to get back to where you currently are. </p><p> </p><p>Personally, I am more concerned with bone fragments in my meat than any amount of lead, but if we or the processor cut out the blood shot and fragmented portions then it's not a concern IMO. I cut up my own meat for alot of years and the bloodshot extended well past the wound cavity and any meat that had been in contact with lead.</p><p> </p><p>Hope this helps</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SBruce, post: 571313, member: 21068"] I've been shooting the Barnes TSX bullet in 25 caliber for more than a few years now. I don't feel they will expand and transfer as much energy as most normal bullets, [U]given the same impact velocity[/U], but they [U]do[/U] penetrate. IMO, we've gotta keep the impact velocity over 1900'/sec for them to open and act like they are designed to act. This is based on antelope lung shots at long distance. To compensate for lack of expansion and energy transfer on lung shots I used a lighter weight and pushed it faster. That did the trick until the range got over 500/600 yds, then the lower BC started affecting the impact speed.Now there's the Tipped TSX which should perform slightly better than the old TSX when it comes to expansion, but I haven't tried them yet.........key word yet. The Barnes TSX have shot good in my 25-06, but not everyone has had the same results. At least there are other options if they don't shoot well in your gun. There's a few different "non lead" bullets out there on the market now. Just let her know the bullets will be more expensive and you'll maybe have to shoot quite a few of them to get back to where you currently are. Personally, I am more concerned with bone fragments in my meat than any amount of lead, but if we or the processor cut out the blood shot and fragmented portions then it's not a concern IMO. I cut up my own meat for alot of years and the bloodshot extended well past the wound cavity and any meat that had been in contact with lead. Hope this helps [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
I've been given the ultimatum...Barnes?
Top