Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Is faster better?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FEENIX" data-source="post: 2227196" data-attributes="member: 14204"><p>Like @korhill, I, too, am open, but it's an unwarranted claim like this is where I have an issue. I respect everyone's opinions and experiences and was fine until now; a bold claim (<strong><em><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Hammers have no terminal performance limitations)</span></em></strong> like this needs to be substantiated by empirical evidence. I do not think Steve and Brian are making any such claim, except for this pending statement, <em><strong>"All of our bullets are, or will be, tested by Bryan Litz of Applied Ballistics. Our bc values will be listed as Calc, Est, or Litz."</strong></em> I understand a forgiving bullet design, <strong><em><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">sorry but everything has a limitation</span></em></strong>.</p><p></p><p>Out of respect to Steve and Brian, as [USER=75895]@Rick Richard[/USER] would say ...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>My statement above DOES NOT mean I am NOT open to trying Hammer Bullets. As previously noted, end-users need to synthesize the information being presented. Cheers!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FEENIX, post: 2227196, member: 14204"] Like @korhill, I, too, am open, but it's an unwarranted claim like this is where I have an issue. I respect everyone's opinions and experiences and was fine until now; a bold claim ([B][I][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Hammers have no terminal performance limitations)[/COLOR][/I][/B] like this needs to be substantiated by empirical evidence. I do not think Steve and Brian are making any such claim, except for this pending statement, [I][B]"All of our bullets are, or will be, tested by Bryan Litz of Applied Ballistics. Our bc values will be listed as Calc, Est, or Litz."[/B][/I] I understand a forgiving bullet design, [B][I][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]sorry but everything has a limitation[/COLOR][/I][/B]. Out of respect to Steve and Brian, as [USER=75895]@Rick Richard[/USER] would say ... My statement above DOES NOT mean I am NOT open to trying Hammer Bullets. As previously noted, end-users need to synthesize the information being presented. Cheers! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Is faster better?
Top