Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
Interpreting Data - Help
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deputy819" data-source="post: 2155593" data-attributes="member: 98025"><p>Okay. Well, <strong><em>IF </em></strong>it were me (and considering your stated concern) I'd go do a seating depth test at a point completely away from any perceived powder node and go with the best group. Bring <strong>that </strong>group back to the table (#4-#5) and see what happens. That perceived 'node' could change if the preferred seating depth got drastic. I like the way that #7 & #8 <strong>appeared</strong> to be 'flattening out', but that may not be stable if you plan on shooting this in the heat of the summer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deputy819, post: 2155593, member: 98025"] Okay. Well, [B][I]IF [/I][/B]it were me (and considering your stated concern) I’d go do a seating depth test at a point completely away from any perceived powder node and go with the best group. Bring [B]that [/B]group back to the table (#4-#5) and see what happens. That perceived ‘node’ could change if the preferred seating depth got drastic. I like the way that #7 & #8 [B]appeared[/B] to be ‘flattening out’, but that may not be stable if you plan on shooting this in the heat of the summer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
Interpreting Data - Help
Top