Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Independently verified BCs for Whiskey 3 Precision Bullets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Courtney" data-source="post: 983159" data-attributes="member: 28191"><p>A while back there was a thread on a W3PS, a new bullet company advertising very high BCs. There was some debate as to whether these new bullets really meet their specs, and various forum members mentioned acquiring bullets for testing.</p><p></p><p>Have any independent BC measurements been done with an accepted BC measurement method (near velocity and time of flight; near and far velocity)?</p><p></p><p>I think some 155 grain .308 bullets had been sent to Michael Eichele who intended to use the near and far velocity method and conduct a side-by-side comparison with the 155 AMAX. Are these results available yet?</p><p></p><p>Personally, I share the skepticism expressed by forum members that these bullets have BCs anywhere near what is being advertised. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and I cannot find much in terms of evidence supporting these extraordinary BC claims.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Courtney, post: 983159, member: 28191"] A while back there was a thread on a W3PS, a new bullet company advertising very high BCs. There was some debate as to whether these new bullets really meet their specs, and various forum members mentioned acquiring bullets for testing. Have any independent BC measurements been done with an accepted BC measurement method (near velocity and time of flight; near and far velocity)? I think some 155 grain .308 bullets had been sent to Michael Eichele who intended to use the near and far velocity method and conduct a side-by-side comparison with the 155 AMAX. Are these results available yet? Personally, I share the skepticism expressed by forum members that these bullets have BCs anywhere near what is being advertised. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and I cannot find much in terms of evidence supporting these extraordinary BC claims. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Independently verified BCs for Whiskey 3 Precision Bullets
Top