Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
IMR 4831 vs H4831sc
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grumulkin" data-source="post: 675143" data-attributes="member: 29281"><p>I would disagree with the smaller cases part. I use H4831SC in a 300 Winchester Magnum and a 378 Weatherby Magnum with excellent results.</p><p></p><p>Though IMR 4831 and H4831SC are different powders, you will find that in many instances, where one of them is listed the other will be as well. Also, you'll find there is a fairly consistent relationship between them in regards to listed loads. That means the knowledgable handloader can, with some extrapolation, find a starting load when only one is listed for a particular cartridge.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grumulkin, post: 675143, member: 29281"] I would disagree with the smaller cases part. I use H4831SC in a 300 Winchester Magnum and a 378 Weatherby Magnum with excellent results. Though IMR 4831 and H4831SC are different powders, you will find that in many instances, where one of them is listed the other will be as well. Also, you'll find there is a fairly consistent relationship between them in regards to listed loads. That means the knowledgable handloader can, with some extrapolation, find a starting load when only one is listed for a particular cartridge. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
IMR 4831 vs H4831sc
Top