Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
IMPORTANT REQUEST
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brown Dog" data-source="post: 105634" data-attributes="member: 1622"><p>Bart,</p><p></p><p>Correct on the 1.047 stuff /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif</p><p></p><p>Charles,</p><p></p><p>I agree with your sentiments, my antennae had a mild twitch too; hence my comments in my first post on this, which included: </p><p></p><p> [ QUOTE ]</p><p> .....talking of 'in the parish'and relating it to your use of 'accurate, exact and Critical' ...(and, based on my very limited experience of working 'around' civilian contractors in Iraq)...might be worth pointing out that dependant on your situation in terms of your legal status, the ROE under which you are operating and the requirements of the situation/incident itself, you might want/need to consider the legal ramifications if you 'botch' an engagement (ie kill a friendly or an innocent) using a rifle that has only ever been zeroed at 25m and then set using (what has been kindly described above as) 'SWAP' data. </p><p> </p><p></p><p>[/ QUOTE ]</p><p></p><p>....perhaps I was too polite? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif </p><p> </p><p>....You've expressed the concern far more clearly; there is a definite feel of "all the gear; no idea" to the original request.</p><p></p><p>......I don't know this fellow either and hope that's not the case. </p><p></p><p>...on balance (and, hence my reason for posting) I don't think the info I've given so far will be any more damaging than if </p><p>they just 'had at'.....which if this is a case of ATGNI would happen anyway /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif</p><p></p><p>.....the data requested should not be difficult to obtain in-theatre -if they were meant to have it; </p><p></p><p>Since they have the weapons; my hope is that giving the idea of creating short range practice targets and highlighting 'legalities' might make them safer -in every sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brown Dog, post: 105634, member: 1622"] Bart, Correct on the 1.047 stuff [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Charles, I agree with your sentiments, my antennae had a mild twitch too; hence my comments in my first post on this, which included: [ QUOTE ] .....talking of 'in the parish'and relating it to your use of 'accurate, exact and Critical' ...(and, based on my very limited experience of working 'around' civilian contractors in Iraq)...might be worth pointing out that dependant on your situation in terms of your legal status, the ROE under which you are operating and the requirements of the situation/incident itself, you might want/need to consider the legal ramifications if you 'botch' an engagement (ie kill a friendly or an innocent) using a rifle that has only ever been zeroed at 25m and then set using (what has been kindly described above as) 'SWAP' data. [/ QUOTE ] ....perhaps I was too polite? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ....You've expressed the concern far more clearly; there is a definite feel of "all the gear; no idea" to the original request. ......I don't know this fellow either and hope that's not the case. ...on balance (and, hence my reason for posting) I don't think the info I've given so far will be any more damaging than if they just 'had at'.....which if this is a case of ATGNI would happen anyway [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] .....the data requested should not be difficult to obtain in-theatre -if they were meant to have it; Since they have the weapons; my hope is that giving the idea of creating short range practice targets and highlighting 'legalities' might make them safer -in every sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
IMPORTANT REQUEST
Top