Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
I'm sort of loathed to start this thread but......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MachV" data-source="post: 126265" data-attributes="member: 93"><p><strong>Re: I\'m sort of loathed to start this thread but......</strong></p><p></p><p>A rednecks opinion</p><p>I have a lot of hours behind 2 16x,2 6-24x30mm and a 6-24x35mm IORs.They have all passed the box step with flying colors but I use the MP-8 Reticle a lot more than turning the knobs.</p><p>The glass is better than and they where cheaper to purchase than a NF 5-22NXS,nothing wrong with a NF with R2 riticle!</p><p>Zeiss and Swarovski are not popular in the area are spendy and didnt offer a reticle to my likeing.</p><p>Nikon makes a good scope for the $$ but again the reticle options where real limited.</p><p>Leupold???Well all my scopes used to say leupold on them but there are only 2 3-9s left.Leupold fell asleep at the wheel and lost my business by takeing soo long to offer a range finding reticle.Leupold makes a good scope but to me they are real overprice today for what they offer.</p><p> </p><p><font color="red">Optics: </p><p>Better or worse than Zeiss Victory?<font color="black">no experience</font> </p><p>Better or worse than Swarovski??<font color="black">no experience</font></p><p>Better or worse than Leupold?? <font color="black">better than any I have lookt through</font></p><p>Better or worse than NIKON? <font color="black">Definatly better than any I have lookt through</font></p><p>Better or worse than NightForce? <font color="black">The new 35mm IORs are better and the 30mm are at lest equill to any NF to my eyes</font></p><p></p><p>Mechanics:</p><p>Tougher than Leupold?? <font color="black">In my experiense yes</font></p><p>Tougher than NIKON?<font color="black">In my experiense yes</font></p><p></p><p>Tougher than Zeiss Victory??<font color="black">no experience</font></p><p>Tougher Than Swarovski??<font color="black">no experience</font></p><p>Tougher than Nightforce?<font color="black">In my experiense just as tuff though others have reported more warrentee problems than NF</font></p><p></p><p>More repeatable (box test) than Leupold?<font color="black">In my experiense yes</font></p><p></p><p>More repeatable (box test) than NIKON?<font color="black">In my experiense yes</font></p><p></p><p>More repeatable (box test) than Zeiss Victory??<font color="black">no experience</font></p><p>More repeatable (box test) than Swarovski??<font color="black">no experience</font></p><p>More repeatable (box test) than Nightforce?<font color="black">Just as repeatable..they all workt as advertised</font></p><p></p><p> </font></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MachV, post: 126265, member: 93"] [b]Re: I\'m sort of loathed to start this thread but......[/b] A rednecks opinion I have a lot of hours behind 2 16x,2 6-24x30mm and a 6-24x35mm IORs.They have all passed the box step with flying colors but I use the MP-8 Reticle a lot more than turning the knobs. The glass is better than and they where cheaper to purchase than a NF 5-22NXS,nothing wrong with a NF with R2 riticle! Zeiss and Swarovski are not popular in the area are spendy and didnt offer a reticle to my likeing. Nikon makes a good scope for the $$ but again the reticle options where real limited. Leupold???Well all my scopes used to say leupold on them but there are only 2 3-9s left.Leupold fell asleep at the wheel and lost my business by takeing soo long to offer a range finding reticle.Leupold makes a good scope but to me they are real overprice today for what they offer. <font color="red">Optics: Better or worse than Zeiss Victory?<font color="black">no experience</font> Better or worse than Swarovski??<font color="black">no experience</font> Better or worse than Leupold?? <font color="black">better than any I have lookt through</font> Better or worse than NIKON? <font color="black">Definatly better than any I have lookt through</font> Better or worse than NightForce? <font color="black">The new 35mm IORs are better and the 30mm are at lest equill to any NF to my eyes</font> Mechanics: Tougher than Leupold?? <font color="black">In my experiense yes</font> Tougher than NIKON?<font color="black">In my experiense yes</font> Tougher than Zeiss Victory??<font color="black">no experience</font> Tougher Than Swarovski??<font color="black">no experience</font> Tougher than Nightforce?<font color="black">In my experiense just as tuff though others have reported more warrentee problems than NF</font> More repeatable (box test) than Leupold?<font color="black">In my experiense yes</font> More repeatable (box test) than NIKON?<font color="black">In my experiense yes</font> More repeatable (box test) than Zeiss Victory??<font color="black">no experience</font> More repeatable (box test) than Swarovski??<font color="black">no experience</font> More repeatable (box test) than Nightforce?<font color="black">Just as repeatable..they all workt as advertised</font> </font> [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
I'm sort of loathed to start this thread but......
Top