Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
***i talked to an army soldier today about the 2nd ammendment****
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bullet bumper" data-source="post: 787427" data-attributes="member: 17844"><p>You have read my thoughts . Nowhere in the Constitution does it say anything about AR's or other Auto's specifically . Now we know the intention was to protect the ownership of arms in general but they could use that to brainwash the young and impressionable types to think that it is ok to just take away the Automatics . They replace the Officers and some NCO's with the wrong kind of Americans to give the orders . This may already be happening in the higher ranks .</p><p>Having been a Nam vet myself it is very hard to go against the Army if you value your career and reputation. Refusing to obey an order given by an Officer can get you court marshaled and a dishonourable discharge which is a cruel and inhumane punishment and a fate worse than death. Whether that order was legal or not . The Army is not a democracy ! </p><p>I know of a soldier that committed suicide after being dishonourably discharged , the shame and guilt suffered can be very bad .</p><p>They hold a lot of power over a soldier and the training makes you loyal to the Army and your comrades in arms . </p><p>Then you also have National Guardsman and Police which is a different dynamic again. </p><p>My feelings is there will be resistance to the use of Full Time Soldiers to do civilian weapons confiscations in a general and non emergency situation . It will be Police as they are far easier to use against the innocent and the Judges far more likely to issue Police with search warrants rather than a platoon of soldiers .</p><p>They may look like soldiers but will be Police or at least have Police at the front end .</p><p>Soldiers in general are far more honest and far less corrupt than Police .</p><p>It's a real worry but I don't think it will happen that way .</p><p>It is far more likely that it could happen sporadically around the place a bit at a time in this state and that over time . This way they do it by stealth by limiting the numbers affected at any one time . </p><p>You would think that the Obama administration should be more concerned about North Korean guns than law abiding US citizens guns .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bullet bumper, post: 787427, member: 17844"] You have read my thoughts . Nowhere in the Constitution does it say anything about AR's or other Auto's specifically . Now we know the intention was to protect the ownership of arms in general but they could use that to brainwash the young and impressionable types to think that it is ok to just take away the Automatics . They replace the Officers and some NCO's with the wrong kind of Americans to give the orders . This may already be happening in the higher ranks . Having been a Nam vet myself it is very hard to go against the Army if you value your career and reputation. Refusing to obey an order given by an Officer can get you court marshaled and a dishonourable discharge which is a cruel and inhumane punishment and a fate worse than death. Whether that order was legal or not . The Army is not a democracy ! I know of a soldier that committed suicide after being dishonourably discharged , the shame and guilt suffered can be very bad . They hold a lot of power over a soldier and the training makes you loyal to the Army and your comrades in arms . Then you also have National Guardsman and Police which is a different dynamic again. My feelings is there will be resistance to the use of Full Time Soldiers to do civilian weapons confiscations in a general and non emergency situation . It will be Police as they are far easier to use against the innocent and the Judges far more likely to issue Police with search warrants rather than a platoon of soldiers . They may look like soldiers but will be Police or at least have Police at the front end . Soldiers in general are far more honest and far less corrupt than Police . It's a real worry but I don't think it will happen that way . It is far more likely that it could happen sporadically around the place a bit at a time in this state and that over time . This way they do it by stealth by limiting the numbers affected at any one time . You would think that the Obama administration should be more concerned about North Korean guns than law abiding US citizens guns . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
***i talked to an army soldier today about the 2nd ammendment****
Top