Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Hydrostatic shock, what's your opinion?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ridge Runner" data-source="post: 342103" data-attributes="member: 951"><p>My guess on that and bigs trouble with the 45/70 on deer is this, not enough resistance to expand the bullet, I used a 350 rem. mag occasionaly for about 10 years, never knocked a deer down with it, and always had to track them, and not much expansion either. Once a bullet exits the remaining energy is basicly wasted.</p><p>RR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ridge Runner, post: 342103, member: 951"] My guess on that and bigs trouble with the 45/70 on deer is this, not enough resistance to expand the bullet, I used a 350 rem. mag occasionaly for about 10 years, never knocked a deer down with it, and always had to track them, and not much expansion either. Once a bullet exits the remaining energy is basicly wasted. RR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Hydrostatic shock, what's your opinion?
Top