Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Huskemaw vs. Leupold?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rooster721" data-source="post: 734747" data-attributes="member: 40654"><p>I tend to agree with what's been said as well.. 'nother vote for Huskemaw</p><p> </p><p>In my own opinion, the Huskemaws do have very good glass.. they have an excellent reticle, it's simple & quick, not cluttered... parralax works very nicely, <u>turrets attach threaded from above into gears, <strong>no lousey allen screws to get lost!!!</strong></u> VERY NICE in my-opinion (reminds me of Zeiss) ...and best of all, the tracking and repeatability is <strong>for sure</strong> reliable (not so regarding the Leupolds of 'my' past anyway*) I use mine for hunting and targets alike and am very very happy with it.. I have intentions to replace one of my other scopes with a second huskemaw following a re-barrel job on my latest rig... big 7mm I'm gearing-up for the 195's Berger is working on ~ but is a story for elsewhere</p><p> </p><p>Long n short.. the Huskemaws will surprise you. Once you try one ya won't want whatever your old one was... they're just "that nice" to shoot through. And judging from the scabbard-time and abuse the horses and outfitters have put to those scopes (that so many carry cinched onto their saddles) I would imagine there isn't much any average shooter could do to wreck one.. </p><p> </p><p>I believe they're here to stay* </p><p>Definitely +1 for the Husky's</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rooster721, post: 734747, member: 40654"] I tend to agree with what's been said as well.. 'nother vote for Huskemaw In my own opinion, the Huskemaws do have very good glass.. they have an excellent reticle, it's simple & quick, not cluttered... parralax works very nicely, [U]turrets attach threaded from above into gears, [B]no lousey allen screws to get lost!!![/B][/U] VERY NICE in my-opinion (reminds me of Zeiss) ...and best of all, the tracking and repeatability is [B]for sure[/B] reliable (not so regarding the Leupolds of 'my' past anyway*) I use mine for hunting and targets alike and am very very happy with it.. I have intentions to replace one of my other scopes with a second huskemaw following a re-barrel job on my latest rig... big 7mm I'm gearing-up for the 195's Berger is working on ~ but is a story for elsewhere Long n short.. the Huskemaws will surprise you. Once you try one ya won't want whatever your old one was... they're just "that nice" to shoot through. And judging from the scabbard-time and abuse the horses and outfitters have put to those scopes (that so many carry cinched onto their saddles) I would imagine there isn't much any average shooter could do to wreck one.. I believe they're here to stay* Definitely +1 for the Husky's [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Huskemaw vs. Leupold?
Top