Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
How "long" is "long range"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LouBoyd" data-source="post: 262722" data-attributes="member: 9253"><p><strong>Re: How \"long\" is \"long range\"</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's as good of definition as I've seen.. The important part is "needed for a humane kill".</p><p></p><p>You can more than double your hunting range if you adapt the concept of collateral damage to your decision to take a shot. </p><p></p><p>United States Department of Defense definition: collateral damage — Unintentional or incidental injury or damage to persons or objects that would not be lawful military targets in the circumstances ruling at the time. Such damage is not unlawful so long as it is not excessive in </p><p>light of the overall military advantage anticipated from the attack. (Joint Publication 3-60)</p><p></p><p>Once morality is in question not only the probably of a clean kill but the reason to kill at all needs to be considered.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LouBoyd, post: 262722, member: 9253"] [b]Re: How \"long\" is \"long range\"[/b] That's as good of definition as I've seen.. The important part is "needed for a humane kill". You can more than double your hunting range if you adapt the concept of collateral damage to your decision to take a shot. United States Department of Defense definition: collateral damage — Unintentional or incidental injury or damage to persons or objects that would not be lawful military targets in the circumstances ruling at the time. Such damage is not unlawful so long as it is not excessive in light of the overall military advantage anticipated from the attack. (Joint Publication 3-60) Once morality is in question not only the probably of a clean kill but the reason to kill at all needs to be considered. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
How "long" is "long range"
Top