Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
How do you determine "at the lands" by your method?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brent" data-source="post: 33702" data-attributes="member: 99"><p>These are obviously some of the finer points in handloading and I know I've heard plenty of people say they do it all, some for confidence, some say it all shows improvements.</p><p></p><p>I can't help but wonder what the difference would be if you took normal cafefully prepped brass, turned and such, no detail missed, then seated bullets that never went through any sorting inspection process and compared them to same load with bullets that had been through every uniforming procedure mentioned, even spun on the Verne Juenke ICC...</p><p></p><p>If there was an advantage of increased precision to doing all the work on bullets, one should see a the largest improvement by doing everything he could to one batch of loads and nothing to the other, although you would have to isolate the advantage contributed by each step if you wanted to eliminate any that might prove un-useful. </p><p></p><p>Has anyone done this sort of all or nothing comparison before? If so, what did you find and how confident are you other variables were not influencing the testing?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brent, post: 33702, member: 99"] These are obviously some of the finer points in handloading and I know I've heard plenty of people say they do it all, some for confidence, some say it all shows improvements. I can't help but wonder what the difference would be if you took normal cafefully prepped brass, turned and such, no detail missed, then seated bullets that never went through any sorting inspection process and compared them to same load with bullets that had been through every uniforming procedure mentioned, even spun on the Verne Juenke ICC... If there was an advantage of increased precision to doing all the work on bullets, one should see a the largest improvement by doing everything he could to one batch of loads and nothing to the other, although you would have to isolate the advantage contributed by each step if you wanted to eliminate any that might prove un-useful. Has anyone done this sort of all or nothing comparison before? If so, what did you find and how confident are you other variables were not influencing the testing? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
How do you determine "at the lands" by your method?
Top