Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Long Range Hunting & Shooting' started by FEENIX, Aug 14, 2014.
... inspired by ...
For long range crossbow?
Lol feenix. Their next venture can be a new reticle 7, 10 & 15 yards for true sportsmen/hunters.
Maybe they can even start a new wrist rocket division, and develop a decent reticle for it also.
On a serious note, I am a big Leupold fan and thankful for what they've accomplished in the hunting/shooting industry ... no problem with them, just B&C's stance in LRH. The only clear winner is the anti-hunting crowd.
I have that reticle in 1 of my scopes and then added the m1 turrets. Is that legal? I am also a die hard bow hunter and used to shoot 80-100 yard targets for practice routinely. I guess that makes me an outlaw x2.
I think you shouldn't be able to enter your animal in the B&C records if you didn't count coup on it before you killed it.
thank you sir for the recognition .....i thought this kind of crap only happened in my country.
I bought a Leupold 2-12 about a week ago, I wish now I had got the BC reticle so I could send it in and have it removed.
Lol.... If I had one... I'd do the same. That might send a message more loud and clear than all of us just ragging on their new stance for hunting in here.
I have one but I don't have any problem with Leupold or the reticle, just B&C's stance.
But it's a thought nonetheless and might have to check on it for options, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
I just e-mailed Leupold this ...
We'll see what kind of response I get.
What if leupold just changed the name of the reticle. To me it would show support of the user of this type of reticle and send a message to B&C.
I'm good with that!
That's a good one also. I've no problem with Leupold either, but anything that makes them hmmmmmmmmm about it for a bit entertains me.